Absolute proof: A Pentagon picture montage from start to finish

ABSOLUTE proof is hard to find but it is utterly necessary in some cases, a murder for example, a robbery, something where people’s lives are at stake.

I have found that proof, thanks to a valiant effort by, and my opposition to, some very diligent believers in the Original Story given to us by the media on 9/11. Take a look!

PICTURE 1

A picture by Daryl Donley who was on the scene at the time of the explosion. This shows the center of the explosion site minutes after it happened. (The round parts in the center of the picture are rolls of cable, see close-up on Picture 5)

PICTURE 2

A wide-angle view of the explosion site; notice the entire Pentagon wall is standing and intact. The media told us this was the site of a crash by the hijacked American Airlines Flight 77, a Boeing 757-200, weighing around 200,000 pounds and 125 feet across at wingspan. A photograph from the (now unaccepted) NIST report shows the same spot as the center of damage.

PICTURE 3

20 minutes AFTER the explosion the wall collapsed. The previous hole was about 12-15 feet high. Notice in the previous picture the hole in the Pentagon was entirely hidden behind a 15 foot high spray of water.

PICTURE 4

After the explosion the hole was about 12 feet, after the wall collapsed the damaged area was about 70 feet across. A Boeing 757 has a 124’10” wingspan. Can a 125 foot wide aircraft fit into a hole 12 feet high? No.

PICTURE 5

This picture is a closeup, also by Daryl Donley. Note the pieces of the Pentagon blown outward, indicating the explosion came from within the Pentagon building itself.
There was never an airplane inside the Pentagon, because the original damage was only about 12 feet high.

PICTURE 6

Whatever made the damage to the Pentagon made a tube of damage about 12 feet high, and caused circular holes smaller than the fuselage of an airplane, in concentric wings of the Pentagon. This is also visible in the NIST picture, the hole in the second wing is also circular and small.

*** THE COVER-UP ***
It’s clear from the first six pictures that no airplane hit the Pentagon and the explosion came from inside the building (speculation indicates either set explosives or possibly a missile).
The media was provided with very little “evidence” of an airplane crash:
* a surveillance video that shows the explosion in action, with a section cut out that would show what hit the Pentagon.
* They also received a few pictures of random aircraft parts.

PICTURE 7

A single piece of unburnt airplane material lying on the grass. This was obviously placed to “help the case” of the original story. Many people want to believe we were told the truth on the 9/11 broadcasts and this helps a few people hold onto the last wisp of that belief.

PICTURE 8

Allegedly a black box, Cockpit Voice Recorder. Since the wall was still intact after the explosion and no flight 77 debris is outside the Pentagon this is obviously not the actual black box (which would indicate the flight path, voices in the cockpit, whether the cockpit door was open, airspeed, etc.)

Synopsis:
An explosion happened that created fire damage and a small hole in the Pentagon
there was no airplane

The wall at the center of the damage site collapsed
there was no airplane

There are several concentric, small circular holes passing through the Pentagon
there was no airplane

A few random pieces of debris from an unidentifiable airplane were placed at the scene
there was no airplane

THE ORIGINAL STORY – THAT MUSLIM HIJACKERS STOLE AN AIRPLANE AND CRASHED INTO THE PENTAGON WAS A LIE.

Polish opposition party demands international investigation into plane crash

According to a report from Warsaw of the Austrian journalist Jane Burgermeister who is engaged in investigation of the murder of the Polish elite on April 10, 2010 by the international terrorist organization оf FSB Russia, the failure of the Polish and Russian government to address compelling new evidence suggesting that the plane crash killing President Lech Kaczynski and top military and civilians leaders was engineered is generating growing criticism in Poland, and has forced Prime Minister Donald Tusk onto the defensive.Tusk said Sunday that he would issue a report on the official investigation into the crash on Wednesday. Poland’s chief prosecutor Andrzej Seremet said earlier this week that Polish prosecutors would postpone revealing the contents of the black boxes.

Compelling new facts and evidence that the plane crash two weeks ago in Smolensk was engineered include the revelation that a device warning the pilot of obstacles was turned off. Also, it was revealed that agents belonging to the Polish secret service raided the flats and houses of victims three hours after the crash, removing computers and documents. Opposition MPs in Poland on Friday demanded that an international commission be set up to examine the scientific evidence into the causes of plane crash.

Furthermore, a Polish general called for Defense Minister Bogdan Klich to resign after evidence emerged that Bogdan was not seeking to conduct a proper investigation. An aviation official scouring the crash site in Russia for crucial scientific evidence was told by Bogdan he did not require an interpreter, and was expected to pay the costs of his investigation out of his own pocket.

Forums and message board of Polish newspapers such as “Gazeta Wyborcza”, “Rzeczpospolita” and “Dziennik”  indicate that the majority of Polish people, in the meantime, reject the official account of the plane crash due to pilot error.

Access to scientific evidence and expert information on the plane crash has been limited. The Russian prime minister Vladimir Putin, who took charge of the investigation shortly after the crash in Smolensk, is the only person in Russia allowed to comment, but has so far made no statement.

Similarly, the exclusive right to release information on the crash in Poland is reserved to Tusk.

Authorities have so far failed to provide credible answers to the many unanswered questions that have emerged.Authorities as well as the controlled mainstream media were quick to blame the crash on pilot error and fog.

In addition, the rumor that Kaczynski had pressured the pilot to land and so caused the crash spread within hours in the mainstream media and was repeated without criticism even in some blogs belonging to the alternative media.

Read more: http://kavkazcenter.com/eng/content/2010/04/26/11937.shtml

The Heather Material: Ben's Story

[vsw id=”uyEagFbdFiE” source=”youtube” width=”510″ height=”410″ autoplay=”no”]

Back in October of 2009 we received an email from someone who called herself Heather Anderson. She wrote …”I wish not to be named and heather is what you will call me for now…” She was on the run from a black project that was a spin-off of Project Talent. She had been working with top scientists building human looking robots based on the Duncan O’Finioan prototype… Apparently they had gotten so far along, that they were sending these robots, with some success through portals into other dimensions. Whether or not Ben’s story and consequently Heather’s, is the truth or a complete fabrication to this day is unknown. What we do know, is that many of our whistleblower testimonies seem to validate that such programs exist. This audio interview along with the 17 page .pdf file is a tantalizing look into a project so secret that even our whistleblowers have warned us against even talking about it. Go to http://projectcamelotportal.com for more information…. Kerry Cassidy

Mysterious radio waves emitted from nearby galaxy

There is something strange in the cosmic neighbourhood. An unknown object in the nearby galaxy M82 has started sending out radio waves, and the emission does not look like anything seen anywhere in the universe before.

“We don’t know what it is,” says co-discoverer Tom Muxlow of Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics near Macclesfield, UK. The thing appeared in May last year, while Muxlow and his colleagues were monitoring an unrelated stellar explosion in M82 using the MERLIN network of radio telescopes in the UK. A bright spot of radio emission emerged over only a few days, quite rapidly in astronomical terms. Since then it has done very little except baffle astrophysicists.

It certainly does not fit the pattern of radio emissions from supernovae: they usually get brighter over a few weeks and then fade away over months, with the spectrum of the radiation changing all the while. The new source has hardly changed in brightness over the course of a year, and its spectrum is steady.
Warp speed

Yet it does seem to be moving – and fast: its apparent sideways velocity is four times the speed of light. Such apparent “superluminal” motion has been seen before in high-speed jets of material squirted out by some black holes. The stuff in these jets is moving towards us at a slight angle and travelling at a fair fraction of the speed of light, and the effects of relativity produce a kind of optical illusion that makes the motion appear superluminal.

Could the object be a black hole? It is not quite in the middle of M82, where astronomers would expect to find the kind of supermassive central black hole that most other galaxies have. Which leaves the possibility that it could be a smaller-scale “microquasar”. A microquasar is formed after a very massive star explodes, leaving behind a black hole around 10 to 20 times the mass of the sun, which then starts feeding on gas from a surviving companion star. Microquasars do emit radio waves – but none seen in our galaxy is as bright as the new source in M82. Microquasars also produce plenty of X-rays, whereas no X-rays have been seen from the mystery object. “So that’s not right either”, Muxlow said.

His best guess is still that the radio source is some kind of dense object accreting surrounding material, perhaps a large black hole or a black hole in an unusual environment. Perhaps the phenomenon also happens occasionally in our galaxy, but is more common in M82 because it is a “starburst” galaxy – a cosmic cauldron where massive stars are forming and exploding at a much higher rate than in the Milky Way, creating a lot of new black holes.

Muxlow will report the discovery at the Royal Astronomical Society National Astronomy Meeting in Glasgow, UK, today.

Source: http://3citynewswire.wordpress.com/2010/04/15/mysterious-radio-waves-emitted-from-nearby-galaxy