Engineered Storm? HAARP Monitoring Project Records Strongest Readings Ever Directed In Path of Hurricane Sandy

By Alex Thomas
theintelhub.com
October 27, 2012

An independent website that has a real-time sensor network from over 28 sensors placed in rural areas across the United States has recorded the strongest HAARP readings in the projects history.

The readings, in and around the New England area, are literally off the charts and lend credence to other claims that Hurricane Sandy is possibly being engineered to cause massive destruction.

https://i1.wp.com/www.theweatherspace.com/news/images/102612a.jpg

Screen shot of the readings taken by HaarpStatus.com

Continue reading

Dutch Sinse under Attack Too Accurate–Friend Shot –Professional Hit!

August 14, 2011
Jeff

Hi Steve / support staff,

I’ve been a listener of Steve’s for many years and now I need to find out if he can SHED SOME LIGHT!!

The light of truth and bright one at that, needs to be shined on this situation if you are willing??

RE: YouTuber dutchsinse  THIS IS ALL HIS WORK AND RESEARCH on HAARP:

http://www.dutchsinse.com/blog/?p=660 dozens of links to HAARP patents etc. etc.

http://www.dutchsinse.com/blog/?p=605 Images you MUST see!!!!!!  THIS is what he does.

http://www.youtube.com/user/dutchsinse Channel

I know you know Alex, Jeff, George, and many many other powerful voices who can perhaps rally the support now needed.

The is a YouTuber who’s channel name is dutchsinse from St. Louis who does some amazing work studying HAARP, earthquakes, and volcanos.  It’s far beyond the scope of this email to explain how good he is at what he does, but if it helps any to know this much, he first REALLY started drawing attention when he posted a warning about a potential large earthquake in Japan only a few days before they got hit in March. Since then, with almost daily updates on HARRP rings he can find on weather radar systems he’s very accurately predicted violent weather and tornadoes dozens of times. 24 -48hrs in Advance.

Here’s the stats on his channel, and most all of this is just in the last 6 mo.

Channel Views:3,437,533
Total Upload Views:12,869,647  – –  YES that’s 12+ MILLION views of his uploads.

He even has this posted on his channel…………

“from one of my viewers who has family in Joplin Missouri —

“Just in. My step son living in the vicinty of Carrosel Park(sp) on the 3800 block of West 7th, Joplin had listened to my ranting of Flash rings seen in general area, had packed up family, summer, clothes and valuables then left the area for the weekend in the hills near Anderson. Thanks to you they and their worth are ok. House, boat and all else are gone but my daughter, stepson and grandkids are ok….Thanks to you –youtube user billyhayes548″

I’ll let you guys do your own investigating on this, BUT WHAT YOU WON’T FIND….. is 100 plus videos that YouTube just made him
take off his channel from back when he posted warnings about Japan BEFORE it happened.

HIS BEST FRIEND WAS JUST SHOT 5 TIMES with an AK-47 under VERY odd circumstances at  6:20AM in St. Louis about 3 days ago (2 guys – black Hummer)  and he HAD received threats and his channel and work recently came under a lot of attack.

HIS WORK even prompted the USGS  to issue two different press releases regarding what Dutch is still pretty certain where / are volcanic plumes / venting from SoCal all the way to WA.  He also has strong suspicion that USGS is downgrading / hiding the actual size of the EQ’s it’s reporting on it’s site.

HE REALLY NEEDS SUPPORT ….they are trying to shut him down and just 3 days after his close friend got shot, then YT makes him take down all those videos.

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE….  If there is ANY way you or Alex or anyone else you know can help this guy out here, he has a LOT
of good people who love and support him a bunch, but they don’t want him to get hurt.

HE IS SCARED…. He just posted this on his channel tonight:

” I just deleted WELL OVER 100 videos… thanks youtube, thanks to trolls.. copyright violations on the Japan tsunami videos I posted at the time in March??!! really??? well .. now youtube.. i just NUKED my effin channel.. enjoy the low views!”

“dutchsinse:  deepest aplogies to anyone upset with me.. I won’t be around for a while.. upsetting developments have occurred— im coming to figure out that video making about the “real truth” is NOT worth the pain caused in “real life”

Many many people are praying for him to be surrounded by angels and for God’s hand of protection to be on him. He has moved his family to a secure location for now.  PLEASE see if you can contact him and offer some support or advice…he does NOT have a lot of money, and though many have insisted on sending him donations, he’s never tried to make money from his work. HE ONLY  is concerned with peoples safety.

VERY VERY VERY Sincerely,
Jeff in Oregon

Source: http://stevequayle.com/News.alert/11_Global/110815.alert.dutchsinse.html

Things you have to know about Obama

Obama Lies 7 Times In Under 2 Minutes!

Mr Obama: No more secrets , no more lies!

So tell me where is the UFO disclosure, truth about FREE energy, CHEMtrails,  HAARP, earth’s changes, vaccination, about you dealing with an offworld non benevolent race, the military industrial complex of which Eisenhower spoke about, mind control, genetic modified food, suppressing health solution for cancer, AIDS.

And what about the 9/11 truth .

How did Mr. Obama solve the financial crisis?  He rescued the banksters from going bankrupt with our money. They were to big to fail. If you have a look at the architects who were responsibles for the financial system, then you will see that none of them lost their positions. Nothing has changed.

The measurements to prevent a disaster like the financial crisis have not been applied

What has the US government done so for:  give us an illusion of freedom where hunger for control has never been so great.  No more secrets?!

Blessings.

Floating HAARP Platform

Being sea-based allows the platform(s) to be moved to areas where they are needed for enhanced missile defense. As of 2007 the prime contractor for this program, Raytheon IDS had delivered the first two of five planned AN/TPY-2 radars to the Missile Defense Agency. The first radar was delivered in November 2004 and was deployed in Japan. The second U.S. military mobile “X-Band Radar” was deployed in June 2006 to the. ASDF Shariki Sub-base in Aomori Prefecture, Japan. How does the sea-based X-Band Radar system play a role in the Haiti 7.0 magnitude earthquake and Japan’s 8.9 magnitude earthquake? The sea-based X-Band Radar systems are a fleet of floating HAARP systems.

The Sea-Based X-Band Radar (SBX) is a floating, self-propelled, mobile radar station specifically designed to operate in high winds and heavy seas. It is part of the U.S. Defense Department Ballistic Missile Defense System.

The SBX is a unique combination of an advanced X-band radar mounted on a mobile, ocean-going, semi-submersible platform that provides the BMDS (Ballistic Missile Defense System) with an extremely powerful and capable radar that can be positioned to cover any region of the globe.

The Sea-Based X-Band Radar is mounted on a fifth generation Norwegian-designed, Russian-built CS-50 semi-submersible twin-hulled, self-propelled oil-drilling platform. It is based at Adak Island in Alaska but can be moved on its own power to any place in the Pacific Ocean.

The SBX-006 platform has six, 3.6 megawatt diesel generators. When all six generators are turned on the SBX has a 21.6 megawatts capability. By comparison, the HAARP ground based installation (near Gakona, Alaska – 62°23?33.73”N 145° 9?2.61”W) is a 3.6 megawatt facility.

The X-band radar itself, which sits under a dome on top of the floating platform, is the largest, most sophisticated phased array, electro-mechanically steered X-band radar in the world. It consists of thousands of antennae driven by transmit/receive (T/R) modules. T/R modules are multi-functional circuits that can transmit, receive, and amplify signals.

A phased array antenna is composed of lots of radiating elements each with a phase shifter. Beams are formed by shifting the phase of the signal emitted from each radiating element, to provide constructive/destructive interference so as to steer the beams in the desired direction. The signal is amplified by constructive interference in the main direction. The beam sharpness is improved by the destructive interference.

The US land based HAARP facility (Gakuna, Alaska) also consists of a collection of antennae, arranged in a computer-controlled grid, known as a “phased array.” Both the land-based HAARP and sea-based HAARP have the ability to focus radio signals in a precise direction, without the necessity of turning the antennae. Modern radar systems no longer use the revolving dish that we have come to recognize. The new radar antennae, which rely on phased arrays, look more like the flat screen of a drive-in movie, speckled with small umbrella-like antennae in neat rows. The phased array in both the land-based and sea-based HAARPs uses extremely high frequencies to focus a powerful electromagnetic beam to specific locations in the Earth’s ionosphere. Both heat the ionosphere. Ionosphere heating was among techniques investigated by both the US and the former Soviet Union to either enhance friendly or disrupt enemy communications by modifying the natural ionosphere.

HAARP – Atmospheric Heating as a Research Tool

This post is the first one in a serie related to HAARP.

Atmospheric Heating as a Research Tool: Link to Space-Based Solar Power
Eastlund, B.J.; Jenkins, L.M.
Aerospace Conference, 2008 IEEE
Volume , Issue , 1-8 March 2008 Page(s):1 – 8
Digital Object Identifier   10.1109/AERO.2008.4526526

Summary:

Throughout history, mankind has sought to minimize the impact of the unpredictability and severity of violent storms such as tornadoes. To date, solutions have focused on early warning and on development of fortified buildings made to withstand the strong forces that are the hallmark of these atmospheric events. Sophisticated prediction methods have been developed to warn populations of potential storm danger. These “warn and seek shelter” mechanisms have clearly reduced the loss of life and, to a lesser extent, property damage associated with these natural events. However, despite our best efforts, loss of life and costly property damage are still strongly associated with severe weather phenomenon.

This paper describes concepts that use either ground or space based platforms for generating beams of microwave radiation to provide localized thermal heating or ionization of the atmosphere. It is further suggested that these heating techniques could initially be used as research tools for improving computer simulations of atmospheric phenomena. The ultimate goal is to utilize such tools for prevention of severe storm phenomena and eventually for the manipulation of the jet stream for alleviation of draught and floods. The experimental techniques include a) heating of rain droplets with microwaves between 26 and 35 Ghz, b) Heating of atmospheric oxygen with microwave frequencies of about 54 Ghz and c) creation of artificial ionization plasma patterns in the atmosphere which can be heated with microwaves to produce acoustic or gravitational waves and can interact with electrical phenomena by adjustments in atmospheric electrical conductivity. New experimental techniques similar to “ink drop” experiments to determine the diffusion of chemicals in a liquid can be applied to the atmosphere to study heat transport and electrical properties. Weather research concepts are discussed.

The microwave heating technologies suggested in this paper provide methods for rapidly heating – well-defined regions of a weather system. Ground or satellite based microwave phased arrays, focused on specific locations in the atmosphere, will be used to heat the atmosphere and to create useful artificial ionized plasma patterns. Initial experiments would correlate heating in a specific region of a weather system with computer simulations. Weather modification of tornadoes and of the jet stream is also discussed. One such application is to prevent concentration of rotational energy in a mesocyclone by heating the cold rainy downdrafts. The anticipated result is to prevent the precise rotation geometry that can produce a tornado and thus interrupt tornado formation. Methods of influencing the jet stream are also discussed. A new approach to influencing hurricanes and typhoons by influencing the position of the jet stream and the behavior of atmospheric gravitational waves is also discussed. Development of space-based solar power as a clean, renewable energy source for the world’s needs is dependent on an evolutionary approach. Dual use of such systems for weather research and control will increase the economic value of solar power satellites. Understanding the weather and computer simulation of storm systems is necessary before attempting interaction to mitigate storms. When that has been achieved, the initial investment can save lives and reduce property damage. In the process, the fundamentals of space-based solar power are demonstrated, leading to development of commercial energy systems as well as systems for modifying the weather and the effects of global warming on weather.

http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4505446%2F4526225%2F04526526.pdf&authDecision=-203

European parliament about HAARP

– having regard to the hearing on HAARP and Non-lethal Weapons held by the Foreign Affairs Subcommitee on Security and Disarmament in Brussels on 5 February 1998,
….
T. whereas, despite the existing conventions, military research is ongoing on environmental manipulation as a weapon, as demonstrated for example by the Alaska-based HAARP system,

Legal aspects of military activities

26. Calls on the European Union to seek to have the new ‘non-lethal’ weapons technology and the development of new arms strategies also covered and regulated by international conventions;

27. Considers HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project) by virtue of its farreaching impact on the environment to be a global concern and calls for its legal, ecological and ethical implications to be examined by an international independent body before any further research and testing; regrets the repeated refusal of the United States Administration to send anyone in person to give evidence to the public hearing or any subsequent meeting held by its competent committee into the environmental and public risks connected with the high Frequency Active Auroral Research Project (HAARP) programme currently being funded in Alaska;

28. Requests the Scientific and Technological Options Assessment (STOA) Panel to agree to examine the scientific and technical evidence provided in all existing research findings on HAARP to assess the exact nature and degree of risk that HAARP poses both to the local and global environment and to public health generally;

29. Calls on the Commission, in collaboration with the governments of Sweden, Finland, Norway and the Russian Federation, to examine the environmental and public health implications of the HAARP programme for Arctic Europe and to report back to Parliament with its findings;

30. Calls in particular for an international convention for a global ban on all research and development, whether military or civilian, which seeks to apply knowledge of the chemical, electrical, sound vibration or other functioning of the human brain to the development of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings, including a ban on any actual or possible deployment of such systems;

HAARP – a weapons system which disrupts the climate

On 5 February 1998 Parliament’s Subcommittee on Security and Disarmament held a hearing the subject of which included HAARP. NATO and the US had been invited to send representatives, but chose not to do so. The Committee regrets the failure of the USA to send a representative to answer questions, or to use the opportunity to comment on the material submitted.(21)

HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project) is run jointly by the US Air Force and Navy, in conjunction with the Geophysical Institute of the University of Alaska, Fairbanks. Similar experiments are also being conducted in Norway, probably in the Antarctic, as well as in the former Soviet Union.(22) HAARP is a research project using a ground based apparatus, an array of antennae each powered by its own transmitter, to heat up portions of ionosphere with powerful radio beams.(23) The energy generated heats up parts of the ionosphere; this results in holes in the ionosphere and produces artificial ‘lenses’.

HAARP can be used for many purposes. Enormous quantities of energy can be controlled by manipulating the electrical characteristics of the atmosphere. If used as a military weapon this can have a devastating impact on an enemy. HAARP can deliver millions of times more energy to a given area than any other conventional transmitter. The energy can also be aimed at a moving target which should constitute a potential anti-missile system.

The project would also allow better communications with submarines and manipulation of global weather patterns, but it is also possible to do the reverse, to disrupt communications. By manipulating the ionosphere one could block global communications while transmitting one’s own. Another application is earth-penetrating, tomography, x-raying the earth several kilometres deep, to detect oil and gas fields, or underground military facilities. Over-the-horizon radar is another application, looking round the curvature of the earth for in-coming objects.

From the 1950s the USA conducted explosions of nuclear material in the Van Allen Belts(24) to investigate the effect of the electro-magnetic pulse generated by nuclear weapon explosions at these heights on radio communications and the operation of radar. This created new magnetic radiation belts which covered nearly the whole earth. The electrons travelled along magnetic lines of force and created an artificial Aurora Borealis above the North Pole. These military tests are liable to disrupt the Van Allen belt for a long period. The earth’s magnetic field could be disrupted over large areas, which would obstruct radio communications. According to US scientists it could take hundreds of years for the Van Allen belt to return to normal. HAARP could result in changes in weather patterns. It could also influence whole ecosystems, especially in the sensitive Antarctic regions.

Another damaging consequence of HAARP is the occurrence of holes in the ionosphere caused by the powerful radio beams. The ionosphere protects us from incoming cosmic radiation. The hope is that the holes will fill again, but our experience of change in the ozone layer points in the other direction. This means substantial holes in the ionosphere that protects us.

With its far-reaching impact on the environment HAARP is a matter of global concern and we have to ask whether its advantages really outweigh the risks. The environmental impact and the ethical aspect must be closely examined before any further research and testing takes place. HAARP is a project of which the public is almost completely unaware, and this needs to be remedied.

HAARP has links with 50 years of intensive space research for military purposes, including the Star Wars project, to control the upper atmosphere and communications. This kind of research has to be regarded as a serious threat to the environment, with an incalculable impact on human life. Even now nobody knows what impact HAARP may have. We have to beat down the wall of secrecy around military research, and set up the right to openness and democratic scrutiny of military research projects, and parliamentary control.

A series of international treaties and conventions (the Convention on the prohibition of military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques, the Antarctic Treaty, the Treaty on principles governing the activities of states in the exploration and use of outer space including the moon and other celestial bodies, and the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea) casts considerable doubt on HAARP on legal as well as humanitarian and political grounds. The Antarctic Treaty lays down that the Antarctic may be used exclusively for peaceful purposes.(25) This would mean that HAARP is a breach of international law. All the implications of the new weapons systems should be examined by independent international bodies. Further international agreements should be sought to protect the environment from unnecessary destruction in war.

Impact of military activities on the environment

Not only military weapons systems but, by and large, all military activities, including peace-time exercises, have some form of environmental impact. However, when environmental destruction has been discussed, the role of the military has not in general been touched upon, only the impact of civilian society on the environment has been criticised. There are at least two explanations for this.(26) Owing to its secrecy, military activity is more difficult to discuss and it is difficult to set the nation’s top priority – its security and defence – against the environment. At the present time, however, when environmental and natural disasters constitute a serious threat to security, these arguments are more dubious. The armed forces endeavour to prepare themselves in peace time for operations in war in as realistic conditions as possible. They therefore carry out their exercises under warlike conditions, which involves subjecting the environment to great stress. This is illustrated, for instance, by the withdrawal of Soviet troops and the abandoned military bases in Eastern and Central Europe which have left deep scars on the local environment. Military exercises entail widespread damage to the landscape and animal life. Troop exercises subject large tracts of land to extensive environmental destruction. Test sites for artillery and tactical missiles tend to require larger surfaces for military purposes. Likewise, production of munitions and the industry that manufactures military equipment cause widespread environmental problems.

The military is responsible for emissions of several gases affecting the climate, primarily carbon dioxide, but also incineration of fossil fuels and emissions of freons, which results in the depletion of the ozone layer.(27) Consumption of aviation fuel is a major source of emissions of acidifying substances such as nitrogen oxides and sulphur oxide. The armed forces account for much of all consumption of aviation fuel and are responsible for a very large proportion of all aviation emissions.(28) High-flying planes and rockets have a particularly damaging impact on the environment, both in the form of noise and fuel emissions. All rockets using solid fuel emit large quantities of hydrochloric acid in their exhaust emissions and every flight of a space shuttle injects around 75 tonnes of ozone-destroying chlorine. Likewise, noise from military exercises using heavy calibre ammunition may bring about environmental disruption.

Metal pollution is dispersed into the environment through shooting practice; often large quantities of small calibre ammunition containing lead is used and large quantities of lead are dispersed into the environment. Unfortunately, there is no comprehensive information about consumption of metals.

Consequences in the form of environmental problems caused by disarmament is only a recently observed phenomenon. Every year, large quantities of explosive substances are destroyed, mostly through industrial processes. Some ammunition cannot be destroyed in this way for various reasons but must be detonated. Obviously, scaling down is a necessary and positive process but it must be carried out in environmentally acceptable ways. Environmentally sound technology must be developed for the purpose of destroying weapons.

Several nations have already begun to exploit the opportunities for using military-related resources to restore the environment destroyed by the armed forces. All other sectors in society have to take responsibility for the environment and the military sector should also do so. As in other sectors of society, environmental issues must form an integral part of the armed forces’ activities and be incorporated in the decision-making and budgetary processes.

In May 1993, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) took a decision – ‘application of environmental norms to military establishments’ – to encourage national governments to enact national laws for the military sector. Finland, for example, has drawn up a green paper to regulate the impact of military activities on the environment. Sweden has followed suit.(29) In June 1996 Sweden, in conjunction with the USA, also drew up environmental guidelines for military activities.(30) The military should establish environmental targets and proposals for measures to help reduce the impact on the environment in accordance with Agenda 21 and the Rio Declaration.(31) They should also submit reports identifying factors affecting the environment within the armed forces. Environmental impact assessments must be drawn up before new projects commence and when procuring material for civilian and military use.

Every government should take stock of its environmental requirements and identify the military resources which are available for environmental purposes, draw up national environment plans and report their experience to an appropriate body within the European Union and the United Nations.

All military personnel, including conscripts, should receive basic training in environmental matters. The US armed forces are considered to be quite advanced in this respect, particularly in terms of equipment, but also in regard to training. The European Union should cooperate and exchange experience in this sector with the USA to a greater extent.

Strategies for using military resources for environment-enhancing purposes

Prevention of environmental crises requires infrastructure, organisation and increased resources. These are available in the armed forces. Many resources within the military sector could be used to protect, improve and restore the environment. Essentially, this would be based on two stages: a stocktaking stage to assess the suitability of the military resources and a political action plan to guarantee their availability.

Obviously, military-related resources vary a great deal from one country to another but they comprise skilled personnel, engineers, sophisticated hi-tech equipment, organisational ability and military research and development. In many ways, the military sector is in a unique position to strengthen international civilian capacity to implement environmental strategies. Military personnel are wellequipped to intervene in the event of disasters. As distinct from civilian forces, the military are trained to carry out missions under extreme conditions. They can also be called out in the event of environmental accidents and to clear up and destroy high-grade toxic, radioactive and other hazardous substances.

The armed forces also possess a great quantity of information which can help in detecting changes in the atmosphere, the sea and in the earth’s surface and thereby provide an early warning and forestall environmental disasters. Military satellites, aeroplanes, surface vessels and submarines are capable of collecting further information on climate changes and on currents and temperature changes in the sea. Radar, which was developed for military purposes, can be used for environmental objectives. Infrared radar can detect temperature changes in the earth’s surface. For example, American military satellites have been used to establish the number of whales, classify them and save them.

Environmental problems are global in nature and international cooperation is therefore crucial to prevent future environmental disasters. Joint international work can also serve a ‘dual’ purpose; it can build confidence for the very reason that it is carried out jointly – countries assist each other. It can also enable countries to shoulder a reasonable amount of responsibility for the environment in proportion to their strength.(32) Some important areas for joint undertakings might be technology transfer, joint training and education.

Environmental strategies might comprise monitoring the earth’s environment, evaluating the data collected, coordinating scientific work and disseminating information. As a special form of international aid, national resources should be made available to the EU and the UN so that they may be used on request by a country stricken by an environmental disaster. Environmental strategies must also include a global stocktaking of resources suitable for environmental protection.

A disaster force composed of both civilian and military personnel could be set up for deployment in emergency situations. Taking part in international peace-keeping and humanitarian missions is already an important task for the military. However, a distinction must be made between such missions within national boundaries and within another state’s jurisdiction. Lessons can be learned from UN experiences in this respect and, clearly, exercises or deployment on the territory of another nation must take place in accordance with international laws. We should consider which resources can be made available to the UN or the European Union, temporarily, long-term or on a standby basis as instruments for joint cooperation in the event of environmental disasters and environmental crises.

Military bilateral and multilateral cooperation has increased tremendously. Within NATO, a DanishGerman-Polish force is being developed which it will also be possible to use for civilian disaster aid, in addition to having traditional tasks. It is expected to be operational by spring 1999.

….

11. Regards the US military ionospheric manipulation system, HAARP, based in Alaska, which is only a part of the development and deployment of electromagnetic weaponry for both external and internal security use, as an example of the most serious emerging military threat to the global environment and human health, as it seeks to interfere with the highly sensitive and energetic section of the biosphere for military purposes, while all of its consequences are not clear, and calls on the Commission, Council and the Member States to press the US Government, Russia and any other state involved in such activities to cease them, leading to a global convention against such weaponry;

15. Considers HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project) by virtue of its farreaching impact on the environment to be a global concern and calls for its legal, ecological and ethical implications to be examined by an international independent body before any further research and testing;

Source: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2F%2FEP%2F%2FTEXT+REPORT+A4-1999-0005+0+DOC+XML+V0%2F%2FEN