*FIlm* The Calling By Max Igan – A MUST SEE
A truly remarkable look at our galaxy and ourselves.
Max Igan articulately and beautifully takes you on a quest of discovery. A discovery so big it might just change your life.
*FIlm* The Calling By Max Igan – A MUST SEE
A truly remarkable look at our galaxy and ourselves.
Max Igan articulately and beautifully takes you on a quest of discovery. A discovery so big it might just change your life.
(Reuters) – An international team of scientists has recorded neutrino particles travelling faster than the speed of light, a spokesman for the researchers said on Thursday — in what could be a challenge to one of the fundamental rules of physics.
Antonio Ereditato, who works at the CERN particle physics centre on the Franco-Swiss border, told Reuters that measurements over three years showed the neutrinos moving 60 nanoseconds quicker than light over a distance of 730 km between Geneva and Gran Sasso, Italy.
“We have high confidence in our results. But we need other colleagues to do their tests and confirm them,” he said.
If confirmed, the discovery would overturn a key part of Albert Einstein’s 1905 theory of special relativity, which says that nothing in the universe can travel faster than light. (Reporting by Robert Evans, editing by Tom Miles)
A little bit of crazyness does not hurt.
Orrico presents the first public performance of his 8 circles drawing from his Penwald Series at the National Academy of Sciences, Keck Center in Spring 2010. Film by Becky Beamer (www.beckybeamer.com)
by John E Dunn
Experiment spots spooky quantum imprinting effect.
A Nobel Prize winning biologist has ignited controversy after publishing details of an experiment in which a fragment of DNA appeared to ‘teleport’ or imprint itself between test tubes.
According to a team headed by Luc Montagnier, previously known for his work on HIV and AIDS, two test tubes, one of which contained a tiny piece of bacterial DNA, the other pure water, were surrounded by a weak electromagnetic field of 7Hz.
Eighteen hours later, after DNA amplification using a polymerase chain reaction, as if by magic the DNA was detectable in the test tube containing pure water.
Oddly, the original DNA sample had to be diluted many times over for the experiment to work, which might explain why the phenomenon has not been detected before, assuming that this is what has happened.
The phenomenon might be very loosely described as ‘teleportation’ except that the bases project or imprint themselves across space rather than simply moving from one place to another.
To be on the safe side, Montagnier then compared the results with controls in which the time limit was lowered, no electromagnetic field was present or was present but at lower frequencies, and in which both tubes contained pure water. On every one of these, he drew a blank.
The possible quantum effect – the apparent imprinting of the DNA on the water – is not in itself the most contentious element of the experiment, so much as the relatively long timescales over which it appears to manifest itself. Quantum phenomena are assumed to show their faces in imperceptible fractions of a second and not seconds minutes and hours, and usually at very low temperatures approaching absolute zero.
Revealing a process through which biology might display the underlying ‘quantumness’ of nature at room temperature would be startling.
Montagnier’s experiment will have to be repeated by others to have any hope of being taken seriously. So far, some scientists have been publically incredulous.
“It is hard to understand how the information can be stored within water over a timescale longer than picoseconds,” said the Ruhr University in Bochum’s Klaus Gerwert, quoted by New Scientist magazine, which broke the story (requires registration).
What does all of this mean? It could be that the propagation of life is able to make use of the quantum nature of reality to project itself in subtle ways, as has been hinted at in previous experiments. Alternatively, it could be that life itself is a complex projection of these quantum phenomena and utterly depends on them in ways not yet understood because they are incredibly hard to detect.
Speculatively, (and Montagnier doesn’t directly suggest anything so unsubstantiated), it could also be the little-understood quantum properties of the water molecule and not just its more obvious chemical bonding properties that gives it such a central role in the bio-engineering of life-forms. Water might be a good medium in which DNA can copy itself using processes that hint at quantum entanglement and ‘teleportation’ (our term).
Montagnier’s paper goes on to discuss the phenomenon he claims to have uncovered using ‘quantum field theory’ within the context of his personal interest, disease propagation.
A time-lapse taken from the front of the International Space Station as it orbits our planet at night. This movie begins over the Pacific Ocean and continues over North and South America before entering daylight near Antarctica. Visible cities, countries and landmarks include (in order) Vancouver Island, Victoria, Vancouver, Seattle, Portland, San Francisco, Los Angeles. Phoenix. Multiple cities in Texas, New Mexico and Mexico. Mexico City, the Gulf of Mexico, the Yucatan Peninsula, El Salvador, Lightning in the Pacific Ocean, Guatemala, Panama, Columbia, Ecuador, Peru, Chile, Lake Titicaca, and the Amazon. Also visible is the earths ionosphere (thin yellow line), a satellite (55sec) and the stars of our galaxy.
The Commentary that follows is from my [Bill Hamilton’s] source that linked with inside sources and took notes on Project Looking Glass (LG) and Time Travel experiments:
“With regard to LG (Looking Glass): As I understand it, this device (at least 3 to 4 years ago) could not focus on a detailed sequence of activities in the future. In other words, you could not see exactly what would happen, like a series of events. I was told to consider the multiverse (5) idea combined with work by Richard Gott on cosmic strings (6). The multiverse apparently is accessed when the forward mode is set. I was also told to consider the views provided by LG as one of many potential realities (at least in the future view mode).
I have also been told that recently there has been an effort made to outfit videotape recorders to be sent forward through the apparatus, thereby allowing the dark project people to gain some insight into what may take place.
When I heard about this several questions came to my mind. The most pressing of which was: if a camera were sent forward in time/space, would it be able to record anything other than what was immediately in front of its lens? I mean, what if LG were located in the middle of the Groom Lake facility, and the operators wanted to gain insight into the outcome of a conflict, say in the Middle East.
How could a videotape recorder, set to record what was right in front of its lens at that location gather any data on the Middle East if it were still stuck in the middle of the Mojave desert when it got to the future??? Hell, something important could be happening right behind the camera and it would miss it – a couple of degrees change in camera direction allows one set of events to be seen while another set is completely overlooked, much less events half a world away.
To answer this question, my contact was not specific, saying only that cameras did not move, as mass does not change in its perspective to space time. However, such an item placed into the injected atmosphere, might experience a different time, if only briefly. And cameras could film within the gas or see images in the injected atmosphere as though it were a lens reflecting events in and around the column. I was given to understand that the tilt or positioning of the electromagnets would allow different views or positions in the environment to be reflected in the gas column.
(I feel confident that at least two rings of electromagnets are employed and that the rest of the device is composed of a barrel and the gas injected into the barrel – Two different sources have indicated that these are the basic components – These magnets spin in different directions, creating a charge of some kind. Then the gas is injected into the barrel. Depending on the direction of the spin – I am sure speed and tilt and a bunch of other factors must also have an effect – time space can be warped forward or backwards by long or short distances relative to the present. I have reason to believe that the scientists have completed a map of the exact positions and speeds of the magnets necessary to reach targeted times both forward and back.)
Apparently, images of the events at different places, relative to the location of the device can be picked up and in essence reflected off the gas, causing it to behave like a teleprompter or crystal ball, for lack of a better example.
But I am not entirely sure that mass does not move, or that mass is not affected. Since I was also told many years ago about an experiment that went very wrong in the early years of the LG project, involving a test subject of some kind. As I understand it there was significant movement of mass during that experiment, and it ended up with a rather gruesome death for the poor test subject.
(I originally thought it was a monkey, but I found out that there were many test subjects that got sent through, so I am not certain what kind was involved in the experiment that went bad. However, in my typical reverse-logic search for corollaries, this tells me that there must have been many test subjects that made it through just fine. So I am certain that any errors that were made or any miscalculations have long since been corrected).
I wish I could offer you more information.
For what its worth, my sources have confirmed the presence of electromagnets and a barrel-like device which is injected with some kind of gas….these components seem necessary for LG to function as a viewing device. And as for any changes in mass, or movement within time-space…. I really don’t know since my information sources would only tell me ’so much’ about what they saw or experienced at the time they were involved.
But it can be reasoned, based upon what they did say that there were significant experiments in the movement of mass back and forward through time, many of which were successful. I am sure much has been discovered and/or refined in the process since then.”
from ProjectCamelot Website
(6) Cosmic Strings
The numbers that we received before Looking Glass was shut down, disbanded, was that there would be a 19% probability with an 85% confidence, that the disaster would occur, that there would be a transition from Timeline 1 to Timeline 2. But, that then means that there’s an 81% chance that it won’t. And so, the individuals who want to carry the, the negative line, are convinced that it’s going to occur, are not presenting the facts. The facts are: this is the material that we have available that we know.
K: So, what you’re saying is the Illuminati… to get back to that thread…
K: …is basically the side that believes that the transition’s going to occur from one timeline to the other.
D: Not only do they believe it will occur, they want to provoke it.
K: But what… but how does it benefit them to, to provoke it? Why should they want to be P45s?
D: They don’t. The living ones don’t. They’re looking at the P-45s as, as a means to an end for them. They’re not going to live that long. They’re just going to live a normal human life and die, so they want the control for themselves. The fact that the P-45s… that’s how immoral these people are. The fact that the P-45s are wanting us, to, at their stage in their own development, have a disaster which, which justifies their own history, is being used as a means to an end by the Illuminati who would like to see that the population is culled so that they can gain greater control. They don’t care.
K: So, OK. So, what…
D: They just want for themselves. There are really human beings that don’t care, or that care very little.
K: So what you’re saying is the Illuminati want the catastrophe to occur…
K: …so that a certain number… three-quarters is the number I’ve heard… of humanity dies. They get the Earth to themselves…
D: Well, the history reads about a little over two-thirds.
K: OK. Two-thirds.
D: That’s what the history of the J-Rods actually reads.
K: All right. Two-thirds. And then what? I mean, they still have to live through Earth changes and cataclysms, right?
D: Right. But these people are also the ones who have their guaranteed positions in the safety zones… underground facilities, etcetera. And so they are presumed… it is not known for certain, but they are presumed to have actually been …be …the progenitors if you will, of the people who become the J-Rods.
K: I understand. But in a sense… there is a thought that in a sense the P-45s, that side of humanity, is… possibly becomes almost soul-less.
D: They become repressed. They still have their same souls, because even after 7,000 more years of development, I could see the soul, as you see the heart of another human being… I could see the soul in Chi’el’ah. So, it didn’t leave and then come back…
K: But Chi’el’ah was not a P-45.
D: No. He was a P-52, but that just means that he was 7,000 years along the T2 timeline from when the P-45s…
K: So he used to be…
D: …were in existence.
K: …or, his people used to be, a P-45.
K: And a P-46, 47, 48.
D: Yes. Yes… yes.
D: So the soul didn’t go away and then come back. It’s been there. But then… you know what. Look. You can say that some people are soul-less.
K: Uh huh.
D: The Nazis. How much soul did they have when they threw my grandpa on to a car? How much soul did they have? We know that they had a human soul, as black as apparently what it was or as covered over in their demented brains but I still pray for them that they’ve… even them… that they’ve been made whole with God. But they still had their souls even though it was repressed.
D: In like manner, the P-45s have a soul.
K: OK. Well then what… OK. You’ve talked about the P-52 Orions and the P-52 J-Rods. Am I right?
D: Uh huh.
D: There are impacts into our timeline now which have occurred. This is the information that I received not only from Chi’el’ah, but also from the material within Majestic. There are impacts into our reality now, our timeline now, by virtue of the amount of time travel which has occurred. Every time they have gone back in time, they have caused small paradoxes which have built up as our reality that we now perceive. In other words, there is actual Newtonian superimposing. And that is a frightening thing to me.
K: So, it’s almost like putting money in the bank, though, every time they come, from the P-45, in a sense. Their timeline…
D: I look at it more as creating a larger heap of manure. [laughs]
K: Well, OK. [laughs] Emphasis appreciated. However, nonetheless, it is like a deposit towards the actual occurrence happening. It… I mean…
D: I don’t know.
K: …they are agents of change, in a sense.
D: They are agents of change as all human beings are agents of change. But I don’t know whether there is a cause effect, whether there is a nexus between cause and effect, having to do with their amount of time travel and the superimposition which is going on in our reality, and the disaster itself. I think that the disaster itself, from everything that I’ve read and heard, is a direct, ah… consequence of the technological aspect of bringing too much energy toward us, in a non-natural manner.
K: OK. Well basically you’re saying there’s two timelines. I mean, I’m sure you’re aware of the work of physicists now that are saying, “Look, if you can have two timelines, you can have two million.”
D: Well, don’t we really have three? Or four. I’m discussing 24,000s. I’m discussing 45,000s, 52,000s and present day. How many timelines are that? Because these people moved ahead linearly in their timeline. Just because we want to call it Timeline 2 doesn’t mean that there are other effects or superimposings which are occurring on different realities during even their own timelines. We don’t know.
K: Exactly. I mean there’s a sense in which what you are talking about is not so much that the P-45s, for example, Timeline 1 exists, as it will actually separate from our reality and become more like a parallel reality instead of an intersecting one.
D: From what I understand, the people who are just prior, which would be us according to their history, to the people who were just after, exist as a straight vector of time. So in other words, God forbid the catastrophe occur, it will just appear as tomorrow and a catastrophe occurs, etcetera, etcetera, and we move forward and changes start occurring in the Earth, there is a disaster, there is a loss of, of huge life, etcetera. You won’t probably feel anything change aside from the fact that we’ll all be running scared for our lives. Aside from that I have no explanation.
K: OK. You’re saying that if the catastrophe occurs.
K: But if it doesn’t occur, there’s still the element in which we have been visited by, by a timeline which really does exist in a sense …
D: I… I…
K: …and how do you unmake something which has been made? [Dan shaking head no] That’s kind of… I mean, it’s kind of more of a philosophical question…
D: I don’t know, and all I can do is defer to the creator on that …
D: …issue because all we do is perturb…
K: What has told you that this is true?
D: All of the above.
D: It’s all of the above, plus information directly from Majestic.
Looking Glass Technology
K: Why is Majestic in a place to know that this actually happens or doesn’t happen? In other words, you’ve got the Looking Glass technology that they used, and you used. And, you were instrumental…
D: No, I didn’t use it, personally.
K: …in discovering? Were you in… No?
D: No. Oh, no no no no. This is an original technology which was derived from ancient cylinder seals, by people from our future who provided it to us, meaning the rogues, the P-45s.
K: OK. The people who…
D: We wouldn’t have…
K: …are negative.
D: That’s right. We wouldn’t have this lovely technology if it wasn’t planted in our past for us to use now. The entirety of the technology must either be disabled or destroyed.
K: In other words, to unmake the technology.
D: Until at least…
K: So that…
D: …after we pass through this time period. There is no way. From the deceit, the conceit, the avarice, and the greed that I have been around over the last twenty years… so that’s the good side of these two dirty coins. There is no way that they’re not going to start this equipment back up again if it’s usable after this. Of course they’re going to. Come on. I mean, they’ve got this… it’s like a magic box… to try to see into the future. What they’re going to do in the future with regard to that, I’ve got no clue. I have no power over it and I have no clue.
K: OK. So this Looking Glass technology comes from cylinder seals.
D: Originally, yes.
D: Originally it was a series of instructions for accessing the wormholes, which naturally pass in the hyperspace in which we find ourselves. And from there they worked on the technology, they built the equipment from the instructions. After building the equipment from the instructions, they began to tweak it and find different things out about it. One of the things that they found is that they could actually use it as a peering portal, like a peering glass, if you will, to see different aspects of, not only the future, but the past.
K: Are these Sumerian… ah, Sumerian…
D: I would say that they slightly predate Sumerian timeframe but that some of the information which came down from cylinder seals that slightly predated the Sumerian timeframe were then recopied in Sumerian seals as well, and …
K: And Egyptian?
D: …those cylinder seals… Oh yes. And those cylinder seals, to the best of my knowledge, have all been obtained.
K: From Iraq.
D: Some of them from Iraq. Yes.
K: Some of them from Egypt?
D: Some of them from other… Some of them from Egypt. Some of them from other countries where they were being stored.
D: And I really don’t want to get my country into too many problems here. [laughing]
K: And, and you got…
Marci: If we could stop for a second…
K: Go ahead.
M: I want to reiterate. The rogue P-45s jumped back, seeded the technology because…
D: [nods head yes] Uh huh.
M: …that’s what they wanted to do, was to seed the land to help facilitate the catastrophe. Because by placing the technology available they knew that… it would be utilized. And as long as we as people… Oh my God. [camera turns to Marci]. But, they wanted to go back…
D: Oh please, tape her!
M: …and seed the technology because they felt that, as people, we would be unable to break ourselves away from using that technology.
K: How is it that this technology is being utilized now? And isn’t … if you’re talking about a wormhole, isn’t it the same thing as a stargate?
D: Essentially, yes. The technology is not being utilized now. Anywhere we find it, we take it.
K: Who’s “we?”
K: Because you have warring factions.
K: You’ve got the Illuminati on the one hand, you’ve got the Majestic on another.
D: Yep. “We” is the… we is the United States as part of the UN. You know… I don’t really want to comment too much about NATO and who’s controlling the NATO alliance at this point. But….
K: Isn’t it a fact that the Illuminati….
D: We’re doing most of the lion’s share.
K: …would be stealing back this Looking… ? I mean, if they want it to happen, they… Their objective would be to steal these cylinders and get them…
D: [nodding head yes] Yes.
K: …so that they could use the Looking Glass technology.
D: Yes. But they can’t show up as an aggressor to steal anything back so what they do is they vote against us.
K: How does that stop…
D: Well, it plays out…
K: …the technology?
D: It plays out in the UN. Well, we had Looking Glass technology, and portal, actual stargate technology, in Iraq, as late as the start of 2003. And a lot of countries don’t want us… didn’t want us to enter Iraq. We did, though, didn’t we?
K: Right. But how is it that… In other words, if…
D: Moammar just handed his two over. We just told him that we were going to make him rich beyond avarice. And he was a little smarter than Saddam, that’s all. And so what he did is he handed them over and says, “Oh, please, come into my country.” He says, “Look at my equipment to make sure that I’m not making any weapons of mass destruction.” Meanwhile, out the back door goes the two that Saddam actually had transferred over to him.
D: Well, equipment, stargate…
D: …technology. Yeah. For them to experiment with. They were experimenting.
K: But if the Looking Glass technology is the same thing as… it accesses a wormhole… The technology…
D: It actually…
K: …it accesses a wormhole.
D: …does that. Yes.
K: It also accesses stargates.
D: Well, that’s essentially the same thing. I’ve been using the term stargate technology…
K: Stargates occur…
D: …to mean a machine that accesses a wormhole by spreading out the energy, the strange matter or whatever it is… and I’m not a physicist… that spreads it out in a compatible way to either communicate through it… or passage of information. That includes also…
K: But, it occurs…
D: …physical bodies.
K: …it occurs naturally. Stargates occur naturally.
D: Indeed they do.
K: So how do you close those?
D: You don’t. And we don’t want to. We don’t want to. The history reads that the natural passage of us through this energetic space is a good thing. But it’s our use of technology which provokes the catastrophe.
K: So it’s…
D: It’s our enhancement of this natural system, inappropriate enhancement, which provokes the catastrophe. And so, no, we don’t want that to happen. I think that the energetics that we’re passing through is part of what’s happening to us naturally, that’s changing us in a positive way. It’s part of the loving cosmos that we’re part of. I think that’s probably one of the factors, not all, but one of the factors for the rise of these beautiful children, the Indigo children. And, and I’m all for it. I’m all for it.
K: So we want to leave the stargates, the natural stargates. They’re leaving those alone.
D: Right. We want to keep our hands off of nature. Pull our hands away. Get it away from the fruit of the tree of life, so to speak… get it away, and just let nature happen during this time. That will be a good thing. However, we also have people who oppose that because they want what they want when they want it.
by: Matthew Silverstone
(NaturalNews) Did you know that technology can seriously damage your health? Tragically most people still don’t get it. The World Health Organisation (W.H.O.) states very clearly that there are serious health risks from current exposure levels to electronic fields coming from wi-fi, laptops, mobile phones and ipads. Exposure to them increases the risk of cancer, brain tumours, autism, diabetes, chronic fatigue, hay fever and depression.
They state that we are being kept in the dark about these effects due to the fact that “present sources of funding bias the interpretation of findings towards rejection of evidence of possible health risks”
Is it more than just a coincidence that the health of billions of people are being affected since the introduction of technology in the 1980’s.
A staggering 220 million people now suffer from diabetes. This is set to rise to 400 million by the year 2030.
Do you think that it can’t happen to you or your children? Think again. Autism is more common than childhood cancer, diabetes and AIDS combined. Approximately 70 million people worldwide are affected by autism. This number has increased 6,000% in the past 20 years.
Why have we suddenly become intolerant to food? Is it just the chemicals we put in our food that have caused it? THINK AGAIN.
Over 270 million people in the world now suffer from food allergies. Approximately 3 million of them are children under the age of 18. That is a 400% increase worldwide in 20 years.
1 in 4 European children under the age of 10 suffers from an allergy.
Potentially fatal peanut allergies now affect one in 70 children.
An estimated 300 million people worldwide suffer from Asthma, with 250,000 deaths attributed to the disease. That is a 300% increase in asthma in the last 20 years.
ARE YOU PAYING ATTENTION
About 10 million people in the U.S. alone suffer from ADHD (Attention Deficit Hypersensitivity Disorder). Worldwide there was a 400% increase in ADHD in the last 20 years.
2.5m people now suffer from Multiple Sclerosis
ONE IN FIVE people in the world suffers from hay fever which is expected to triple between now and 2030.
ARE YOU LISTENING
Planning to have children, – you had better hurry up. The average man has lost 53% of sperm production over the last 50 years. At the present rate of decline it will take 70 years before the sperm count goes to zero.
31% of pregnancies now end in miscarriage. This number increased between 2005 and 2009 by 15%. In the same period 25% more women received treatment for infertility.
80% of the world’s population suffer from sleeping disorders. In the U.S. 40 million people suffer from some type of sleeping disorder.
COULD IT JUST BE A COINCIDENCE THAT:
1. MOBILE PHONE SALES ROSE FROM 50 MILLION IN 1995 TO 5 BILLION BY 2010
2. THERE WERE 1 BILLION PC’S IN USE AROUND THE WORLD IN 2008
3. THIS NUMBER WILL DOUBLE BY 2013 TO 2 BILLION
4. BY 2012 THERE ARE EXPECTED TO BE 14 BILLION DEVICES CONNECTED TO THE INTERNET
5 6.1 TRILLION TEXT MESSAGES WERE SAID TO BE SENT IN 2010
Do you want to know who benefits from all of our bad health – drug companies!
One of the world’s largest drug companies, Pfizer, saw profits rise from $10.02 Billion dollars in 1995 to $67.8 billion dollars in 2010.
Worldwide sales of drugs in 2012 were a staggering $830 billion dollars.
Global Pharmaceutical sales are expected to reach $1.1 Trillion dollars by 2014
DO YOU STILL NOT GET IT
Technology can damage your health and only one group of people benefit. IT IS NOT YOU.
Anybody could be one of the next two billion sufferers, your sister, brother, mother, father, grandparent, grandchild, friend or colleague.
OR EVEN YOU.
Read more about this at Blinded by Science http://www.blindedbyscience.co.uk
You will be shocked and amazed to discover you have been told only half the truth about science and how it affects your health.
About the author:
Matthew Silverstone is the author of Blinded by science, http://www.blindedbyscience.co.uk a book that will completely change your attitude to your health.
Blinded by Science offers a theory which when applied to factors like water, plants, the Sun and the Moon all seems to make perfect sense. As simple as it sounds, it is the theory that everything vibrates. The book explains that everything vibrates from the nucleus of an atom to the molecules of our blood, our brain, sound, plants, animals, all the way into outer space. Once this basic principle is understood, everything suddenly becomes clear. Once you apply this theory to the world around you, you will be astounded by what you learn. Find out more at http://www.blindedbyscience.co.uk
Planet Earth for Earth Day
The global warming theory left him out in the cold.
Dr. Ivar Giaever, a former professor with Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and the 1973 winner of the Nobel Prize in physics, abruptly announced his resignation Tuesday, Sept. 13, from the premier physics society in disgust over its officially stated policy that “global warming is occurring.”
The official position of the American Physical Society (APS) supports the theory that man’s actions have inexorably led to the warming of the planet, through increased emissions of carbon dioxide.
Giaever does not agree — and put it bluntly and succinctly in the subject line of his email, reprinted at Climate Depot, a website devoted to debunking the theory of man-made climate change.
“I resign from APS,” Giaever wrote.
Giaever was cooled to the statement on warming theory by a line claiming that “the evidence is incontrovertible.”
“In the APS it is ok to discuss whether the mass of the proton changes over time and how a multi-universe behaves, but the evidence of global warming is incontrovertible?” he wrote in an email to Kate Kirby, executive officer of the physics society.
“The claim … is that the temperature has changed from ~288.0 to ~288.8 degree Kelvin in about 150 years, which (if true) means to me is that the temperature has been amazingly stable, and both human health and happiness have definitely improved in this ‘warming’ period,” his email message said.
A spokesman for the APS confirmed to FoxNews.com that the Nobel Laureate had declined to pay his annual dues in the society and had resigned. He also noted that the society had no plans to revise its statement.
The use of the word “incontrovertible” had already caused debate within the group, so much so that an addendum was added to the statement discussing its use in April, 2010.
“The word ‘incontrovertible’ … is rarely used in science because by its very nature, science questions prevailing ideas. The observational data indicate a global surface warming of 0.74 °C (+/- 0.18 °C) since the late 19th century.”
Giaever earned his Nobel for his experimental discoveries regarding tunneling phenomena in superconductors. He has since become a vocal dissenter from the alleged “consensus” regarding man-made climate fears, Climate Depot reported, noting that he was one of more than 100 co-signers of a 2009 letter to President Obama critical of his position on climate change.
Public perception of climate change has steadily fallen since late 2009. A Rasmussen Reports public opinion poll from August noted that 57 percent of adults believe there is significant disagreement within the scientific community on global warming, up five points from late 2009.
The same study showed that 69 percent of those polled believe it’s at least somewhat likely that some scientists have falsified research data in order to support their own theories and beliefs. Just 6 percent felt confident enough to report that such falsification was “not at all likely.”
by David Wilcock 80 different countries have now formed an alliance against the Old World Order / Nazi-esque cabal. Two huge underground cities were destroyed on August 23rd — which may be seen by historians as the critical moment in which the war was won. [UPDATED next morning 9:32 am. Credible insider source confirms these accounts and adds new information! Please link to this article but do not re-post it, as it is being dynamically updated as events unfold. Posting key excerpts with the link is encouraged.] EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW — BY DAVID WILCOCK On Wednesday, September 14th, 2011, I interviewed one of the most interesting and controversial figures on Earth.
The information in this interview has the potential to rock the world. If the story is true, it already has.