All credits go to coolhanddan a member of ATS forum.
Rossi/Focardi E-Cat has been documented before on ATS, below are some and even more to find in search…
Rossi/Focardi on February 10 and 11, 2011, at University of Bologna performed another test of the E-Cat device for 18 hours, putting to rest all the claims that have been put forth to dismiss this new energy source. Celani and others criticized phase-change calorimeters as too complicated so Rossi used a higher flow rate to keep the cooling water from vaporizing. Then there were critical about the enthalpy of wet steam versus dry steam, and the use of a relative humidity meter to determine how dry the steam was. These issues can now be put to rest.
Lenr-Canr.org has an excellent .pdf below, only 5 pages long and highlights what is known and needed to be known.
I would like to focus on now what question and where is MSM….
PESN did an article about the implications of this new technology and what is needed to start it.
Basically, if this technology works as it is claimed to, and as recent testing by outside scientists indicates, it is a game-changing technology. It is revolutionary in the highest sense of that word Never before has there been a technology that could instantly address such a huge problem. The solution for the energy crisis could be here — cheap, simple, and non-polluting.
Global Uses of Cold Fusion
What would this mean to the world? Well, it could potentially solve lots of problems and open up many new possibilities.
First of all, the energy crisis (once enough of these reactors were built and utilized) would be over. Energy would be cheap and clean. We would never run out of fuel. The fuels would be found everywhere so no nation would have an advantage over another. Over a period of time we could phase out fossil fuels all together. Oil could be saved to be used to produce fertilizer, pharmaceuticals, and plastics instead of being burnt.
Secondly, our environment could get a boost. Greenhouse gas emissions could go down significantly. Also, with less exhaust coming from power plants there would be a higher air quality in many areas. If we can get this technology into the poor areas of the world perhaps it could help prevent deforestation. With an unlimited source of energy, water desalinization would become much cheaper. Instead of using freshwater reserves for irrigation and industrial purposes, sea water could be used.
Third, there are many industries that could benefit from a source of cheap energy. For example, the recycling industry uses a huge amount of energy. If energy was “free” these industries could expand. Perhaps landfills could be dug up and the metals recycled. This would reduce the amount of land needed for mining.
My point is that this machine is as important as discovering fire to primitive man, an easy way to produce energy in your back yard so to speak, why are they not rockstar, King of the World types and on Oprah every day?
I have seen many MSM quick 1-2 minute reports on Rossi/Focardi E-Cat with always a question at the end of the report- is this real or just a ponzi scheme, then, even a longer report on something mundane like the celebrity of the week or a dog that can bark “I love you”. What I do not see is the Main Stream Media INFORMING the public. I understand media has changed in the last 20 years from reporting and informing to entertainment and commercials for products.
I do not accept that they can overlook this discovery since even our government says it’s possible.
I do not accept the blackout is due to conspiracy because that would mean every single news outlet is in on it.
Really we have to assume what is going on in the background since we do not see that side of the news world. I know assuming makes an ass out of you and me but how else are we to determine who is the man behind the curtain.
Fox News uses the word “Dubious” below:
Then all the 2nd tier news sources use the same line and bingo, no news…..
I even can find places like Zero Hedge at least writing an article on it. Then on the fifth page of Google it becomes apparent that only fringe websites are carrying this, why?
As PESN cited, the people who would gain from this the most:
Everyone not invested in oil producing companies and countries.
Who loses the most?
Oil producing countries and companies
Top 10 Oil producing companies in the world:
1. Royal Dutch Shell
Top 10 Oil producing countries in the world:
1. Saudi Arabia
3. United States
8. United Arab Emirates
I know some say “Media” was burned back in the Pons/Fleischmann announcement but really that means no one can report on any LENR process again, or something more sinister?
Top 6 News Outlets United States:
1. Time Warner
2. Walt Disney
4. News Corp
5. CBS Corp
6. NBC Universal
7. I would list more but the top 6 buy out the others
Top advertising budgets for US companies:
1. Procter & Gamble
2. Verizon Communication
4. General Motors
6. Johnson & Johnson
7. Walt Disney
8. Time Warner
9. L’ Oreal
10. Kraft Foods
Correct me if I am wrong but I cannot connect any of these dots, even though this article below supports my idea that the more you spend on advertising the more money you make theoretically. It is funny to see the top two news outlets are in the top ten of advertising. I knew of all the pharmacy companies doing the most advertising but this article is about how banks financially do when they spend advertising money.
Through this entire event, why is the news, here in Mexico and United States not picking up on this discovery, and I do not mean science journals and peer reviewer, I mean MSM.
Please help connect the dots on this one, because there is a reason for this to not be news but please what can it be if we cannot conclude the easy one, oil companies and countries putting the pinch on news?