Skip to content

Secretly forced brain implants: Explosive court case

August 22, 2010

Copyright Deborah Dupré 2010. All rights reserved. This article cannot be copied, reposted or republished without consent of author.

Warning: The following article may trigger flashback. If the reader has experienced in-home or facility abuse involving possible forced RFID implanting, please read with care, preferably with a trusted significant other.

__________________________________________________________________

What I found…is there is no law on the books requiring that informed consent be obtained. More important, I believe there is a need for such a law, as there continue to be cases where this basic right–I do view it as a basic right–is abused. As I started out, I would like to put this on a personal level for everyone of my colleagues. You just think about your own family, your own son, your own daughter, or grandchildren who might be, the next time they go to a doctor, the subject of some medical experiment that they are not even told about. I do not think there can be many things more un-American than that. ~ Senator John Glenn, introducing failed Bill S. 193 to 105th Congress.

___________________________________________________________________

Among greatest human rights violations imaginable

Few American doctors, psychologists and psychiatrists will break rank or brave the new world of high-tech electronic abuse some of their patients report but evidence mounts that increasing numbers of innocent citizens targeted for U.S. state-sponsored terror are being secretly brain implanted with U.S. RFID chips without their consent for no-touch torture and mind control plus experimentation. One man evidenced this in court; won his case; and now prepares for a continuationin federal court, due to be equally explosive.

RFID is abbreviation for Radio-frequency Identification, a misnomer due to the device functions consisting of far more than ID. It is used for remote technological harassment, torture and even assassination.

James Walbert, resident of Wichita, Kansas, proved his experience as a Targeted Individual under surveillance includes forcefully implanted RFID chips, including in his brain, and subsequent remote electronic abuse. Walbert told Sedgwick County, Kansas court panel that Jeremiah Redford threatened him with “jolts of radiation.”

On November 25, 2008, the court ordered the associated targeted stalking of Walbert to halt. Walbert then began suffering electric shock sensations and hearing electronically generated tones, including popping and ringing sounds.

On December 30th, Court decided in Walbert’s favor, issuing a first-of-its-kind order of protection, banning Redford from using “electronic means” to injure Walbert. That Order has been violated – including by police Walbert told the Examiner.

“Nothing to date has changed at all – not to say that they are not investigating. There just has been no change at all in this harassment despite this order of protection.”

A common misconception is that RFID implants are solely to track individuals 24/7. “Not so,” say scientists and investigators, including Paul Baird of Surveillance Issues. (www.surveillanceissues.com)

Surveillance Issues provides information about advanced satellite surveillance and “harassment” technologies that covert government agencies and organized crime syndicates are using on innocent people to neutralize them, suppression through mental torment and physical injury. These technologies are effectively used against RFID implanted persons.

Most RFID devices contain at least two parts: 1) An integrated circuit for storing and processing information, modulating and demodulating a radio-frequency (RF) signal; and 2) An antenna for receiving and transmitting signals.

With the second RFID part, the antenna, implanted subject can receive sounds, even verbal orders, and thus be subjected to control against his or her best interest, a method of mind control. With the antenna, the subject can also receive electronic pain and injury meeting torture criterion. The antenna has capacity to covertly assassinate the target by directing electric energy from hand-held devices or satellite to a vulnerable body or organ part. Thus, cause of death is attributed to the subject’s vulnerability recorded in medical records and viewed by most people as death by “natural cause.” (For information on NSA neural remote monitoring, see NSA Signals Intelligence Use of EMF Brain Stimulation, www.surveillanceissues.com/relatedwebsites.htm)

“Mankind has inalienable human rights that are absolute and can not be debased, nor perverted. Human life can not be degraded to a 16 digit RFID chip number embedded under you skin under any circumstance. By uniting on this common ground, we can send a strong message to the IBM funded Verichip that We The People Will Not Be Chipped,” is the mission statement of the group, We the People Will Not be Chipped.”

But what happens when unwitting, innocent persons are covertly chipped, after drugged or otherwise induced to unconsciousness in their homes after unforced break-ins? Not possible? This is being reported throughout communities in the U.S. and other nations – with growing hard evidence to prove it.

The largest deployment of active RFID is the U.S. Department of Defense. (Wikipedia)

Chipped for failure to comply with bullies

“In 2004, I became an inventor and was then threatened shortly afterwards by the party outlined in the protection order,” explained Walbert. “He had stated that I would give him this invention or he would further discredit me and just take it from me.”

Walbert says that’s when it all started.

“The FBI believes it to be close friends of mine who are executing this crime,” says Walbert. “Very soon after the threat for not giving away my invention, I started experiencing very odd things around me, mostly the way people were acting towards me.

Most Targeted Individuals report that friends and even family members begin treating the target differently, as though mentally ill or dangerous. Some of these family members have reported to the Examiner that they were secretly contacted by law enforcement, threatened to keep the contact secret, and told lies about their loved one. The average person perceives and treats the target with less respect or understanding of the state-sponsored crime against them – all due to “official” lies to discredit and isolate the target, making it easier to further persecute him or her since no support or protection exists.

This sworn secrecy part of the program has been reported so many times to the Examiner, it raises serious ethical questions such as: How many people in the fields of medicine and mental health including psychology are directly involved in this system of abuse and just following orders? (See APA CIA torture complicity charge: Is America ready for the whole truth?, Examiner, August 14, 2010)

After a consultation with Walbert, Clinical Psychologists Cathy Meadows, M.A. wrote:

“The techniques used against these targeted individuals are purposely designed to make the victim appear to have a mentally disorder in order to invalidate any claims of wrongdoing by the perpetrators. [The same tactic is presently being used in the Gulf Coast crime against humanity, with focus on mental injury, not physical injuries.] It is a highly organized and multi-faceted attack that is used by many political and religious extremists, by corporations and businesses, and even by organized crime.” (Also see: Dupre, Human Targets: KENS 5 reports on Texas TIs in house of horrors, Examiner, Feb. 19, 2010.)

Meadows concludes stating that Walbert’s “reasons for the covert attack and details he gives about the attack are in sync with what we know about gang-staling and technological harassment and for this reason I can’t rule out his claims.”

Walbert now calmly describes the terrifying experiences hundreds of innocent targeted individuals report, a violation of their bodies and minds:

“I then woke up to bloody ears and lots of ringing and nervous system stimulations. Very soon after that I had went to the doctor and they had found something in my ears.”

Walbert had scars along with this foreign body in his ear according to doctor reports.

“The whole left side of me was damaged,” he told the Examiner.

“I had gone in for an MRI. They found something else in the trapezia area. I had it sent off to a few doctors that I know.” (See image online: mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=07d474d83e&view=att&th=12a81e1308f49269&attid=0.1&disp=inline&zw)

Dr. John Hall identified the foreign body as an RFID chip, consistent with what investigator William J. Taylor had stated.

Wanting to test his blood for any residues from the implant, the following year, Walbert saw the famous Industrial Toxicologist and Doctor of Integrative Medicine, Dr. Hildegarde Staninger with Integrated Health Services out of Los Angeles. After sending Walbert for 30 blood tests in search of damages, Staninger further confirmed existence of the foreign bodies.

“Well we found the damages – and other implants as well,” said Walbert.

He then had further tests run by another investigator to back up findings and confirmations by investigators at William J. Taylor’s Agencies. Again, the new investigations concurred with the old.

Walbert then turned to private detector Melinda Kidder who confirmed the findings, stating that what everyone involved in the investigation had all been saying to be truthful, factual and real.

“Very soon after this, I again turned to the State Rep Jim Guest.”

In 2006, when the U.S. Department of Defense awarded $1.6 million to Clemson University to develop an implantable biochip, WeThePeopleWillNotBeChipped.com’s Yelene Slattery stated, “Soldiers can’t choose not to get certain things done because they become government property once they sign up. When does it end? When does it become an infringement on a person’s privacy?”

Slattery expressed valid concerns that once the chip is in, soldiers can be put on surveillance, even when off-duty, according to CBS affiliate KUTV. (U.S. Military May Implant Chips In Troops’ Brains, Salt Lake City, Utah; Online: http://www.kutv.com/local_story_215001119.html; or see www.wanttoknow.info/a-usmilitarymayimplantchipstroopsbrains)

By 2008, due to Rep. Guest’s leadership in Missouri, it became illegal for businesses to require employees to be micro-chipped.

“When you’re forced to have a chip put in you as a condition of employment, that’s taking away your civil liberties and your freedom,” said Rep. Guest, a King City Republican who added the microchip language to a bill concerning overtime and disability benefits. A that time, Guest vowed to introduce a bill to prohibit all microchip implants in humans. (Chip implants can’t be required in Missouri, Kansas City Star, June 26, 2008-06-26, Online: http://www.kansascity.com/news/local/story/681409.html)

Guest had supported Walbert’s first case in which the first protection order of its kind was issued, a major win that offered a glimmer of hope to the hundreds if not thousands of targets having their lives ruined by a covert, sophisticated system of abuse operating at every level of society.

“This time around,” Walbert said, “I had solid evidence to present to Representative Guest’s offices. Once this issued to his offices, I then had him confirm this evidence as being truthful and accurate and asked for another letter of support per his offices. It was granted.”

Guest proceeded to introduce U.S. House Bill 550 against illegal chip implants.

“Rep Guest had came through again for all the victims, as we all knew he would and continues to do,” said Walbert.

Walbert finally then turned to the Medical Community. He, like other survivors, wants the implanted devices extracted – but that has not happened.

“I was and continue to be turned away out of fear.

“Several doctors stated that they see it on the MRI and agree with other doctors, but they are not going to help out fear that the government is involved and tear their offices apart for any records that are related to this extraction of this implanted device.” (Emphasis added)

Harassment continues

Walbert explains, “In the Order, there’s a request to the Courts to have the defendant withheld from the use of such devices, and that is what the order was issued under that request. That is why it was a hit in such a big way. It was and is still the only order of protection from this equipment and its effects that has ever been issued to date.

“I’m preparing to fight the local police. The Federal courts are the only courts I can fight them in considering this is a federal crime.”

The courts have waived the filing fee for Walbert and are serving the police via Federal Marshall office. They will deliver the suit to the police.

“Thats kinda kool to see happening to them,” said Walbert. “I have political support, investigatory support, medical support, psychological support as well for this case. If there are statement’s that have been made against my mental health then we will just add the defamation into the suit as well. I am trying to get local media involved with this case. Just to expose our police department into an negligent state.”

To date, Walbert’s first case rests on over 557,000 websites, was featured in a Wired Magazine article plus appeared in numerous mainstream media outlets.

Walbert’s next court case is due to be just as explosive as the first. This case impacts not only impacts the innocent citizens who silently suffer persecution, denied by those who could help. This goes further.

Baird told he Examiner yesterday that the system of which Walbert reports and fights also has to do with “exclusion of those with character/integrity from public life; a selection process now perfected with use of surveillance technology to ensure that no opposition exists.”

Baird stated:

“The Big Brother system of control that we now know about is both the essence of the problem and the reason that approaches to public figures fail to get the necessary result. You can find good and bad in most quarters but not in the mainstream media, politics etc. The good – and I’ve found quite a few – are on the outer; systematically excluded.”

To non-believers, including family, friends and professionals who choose to forsake loved ones or clients due to this seemingly unbelievable hidden system of persecution, including by media, medical and mental health professionals, Walbert says:

“Anyone who who wants more evidence, I have over 800 documents of solid irrefutable evidence to share.”

Sources

2010-03-22 Jim Guest Letter RE Implant of Foreign Device.pdf (Download)

Februray 5 James Walbert Medical Necessity Letter Damages 2010.pdf. (Download)

Walbert Letter to the Court.pdf (Download )

Federal case filed 7-20-20110 (Download)

We The People Will Not Be Chipped: www.WeThePeopleWillNotBeChipped.com

Representative Jim Guest (MO) Letter to Congress: http://www.freedomfchs.com/repjimguestltr.pdf

Spychips: How Major Corporations and Government Plan to Track Your Every Move with RFID

“Satellite Tyranny” by Paul Baird: www.surveillanceissues.com

Want to Know: www.WantToKnow.info/microchipimplants

American Cognitive Liberties Association: http://americancognitivelibertiesassoc.org/default.aspx

Monarch the New Pheonix Program: http://www.monarchnewphoenix.com/index.htm

On The Need For New Criteria Of Diagnosis Of Psychosis In The Light Of Mind Invasive Technology, Carole Smith, Journal Of Psycho-Social Studies , Vol 2(2) No 3 2003:
http://www.angelfire.com/or/mctrl/NewCrit-JPSS-CS2.htm

Wired Magazine: Court to Defendant: Stop Blasting That Man’s Mind! | Danger Room

Copyright © 2010 Deborah Dupre. All rights reserved. This article cannot be copied, posted, republished without author permission.

Deborah Dupré, with post-graduate science and education degrees from U.S. and Australian universities, has been a human and environmental rights advocate for over 25 years in the U.S., Vanuatu and Australia. Support her work by subscribing to her articles and forwarding the link of this article to friends and colleagues or reposting only the title and first paragraph linked to this Examiner page. Dupre welcomes emails: info@DeborahDupre.com See herVaccine Liberty or Death book plus Compassion Film Project DVDs.

Take Action

See: BAN ELECTRONIC WARFARE ON CIVILIANS

Australians: Email your local government representative and tell them about the ‘Bodily Integrity Act‘ and encourage them to learn more about this insidious agenda. Click here to read about the “Bodily Integrity Act“. Contact numbers and email addresses for Australian representatives are at http://www.wethepeoplewillnotbechipped.com/action. (Source: We the people will not be chipped!)

Learn more

www.nationalcaresociety.org

www.catchcanada.org

www.freedomfchs.com

www.oasisturningpoint.org

www.mindjustice.org

www.stopcovertwar.com

www.raven1.net

www.raven1.net/glossary.htm

www.multistalkervictims.org

www.shoestringradio.net

www.shoestringradio.net/policewhoknow.txt

www.shoestringradio.net/docswhoknow.txt

www.eharassment.ca

www.mindcontrolforums.com

www.americancognitivelibertiesassoc.org

www.stoporganizedstalking.org

www.psychologicalharassment.com

www.govharass.com

www.us-government-torture.com

www.us-government-torture.com/Larson%20/Report%20Edit.pdf

www.afafa.org

www.projectcensored.org

www.thematrixdeciphered.com

www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mkultra

www.wikipedia.org/wiki/mind_control

www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaslighting

www.wikipedia.org/wiki/cointelpro

www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Olson

www.lesliecrawford.cabanova.com

archive.democrats.com/view.cfm?id=1275

www.rob-profile.com

www.jbhfile.com

www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrol10pg

www.wanttoknow.info/emailmk

www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrolinformation#mindcontrolsummaries

www.webspawner.com/users/perpbuster

www.bugsweeps.com/info/electronic_harassment.html

www.exoticwarfare.com

www.exoticwarfareproof.org

www.amnestyusa.org/Reports_Statements_and_Issue_Briefs/Torture_and_the_Law/page.do?id=1107981&n1=3&n2=38&n3=1052

takeaction.amnestyusa.org

Advertisements
One Comment leave one →
  1. Barbara Lindsey permalink
    July 17, 2011 11:30 pm

    Hello.
    Can you please send me any cases or information that would help me in a lawsuit
    I am filing because a microchip was injected into my head by a doctor. This information is needed right away in order to encourage an attorney to take my case. My statute is up very soon. I have prove because it was removed by another doctor and verified bya lab.
    Please email me back if you can help me.
    Barbara Lindsey

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: